So now that I have realized what I am, a Blog, I should start thinking about why I am. As it stated in the very enlightening article about “The Blogging Phenomenon”, I am an extension of a being who wishes to tell the world something about them or about an opinion it has. So I exist to allow for the dispersion of ideas and opinions into the mainstream world, and allow these ideas and opinions to be easily accessible. [Interesting] Let’s play a hypothetical game. Say that there is a Blogger, we will call them “blogger1”, out on the Internet and they have an opinion about something that is going on in the corporeal world. Then let’s say someone else, “blogger2”, has an opinion on the same topic however it is the opposite of the first Blogger1. Then we will imagine that both of these blogs claim that their opinion is a fact. We know that one of them has to be fake and untrue. Am I an untrue Blog? Which blog, in this instance would be relevant, should we arrive at the answer of relevance due to how many people visit each blog; the one with the most hits wins. That does not sound logical at all. I don’t want people to not want to come to visit me because they think that I will lead them astray with faulty knowledge. I want people to trust me and find me credible. I must learn a way in which I can be helpful and a useful tool. I have learned the ways that I can be irrelevant now I want to know how I can be relevant.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment